[1]周莉.牙釉质EPR剂量测定方法的主要影响因素分析[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2004,28(3):128-132.
　ZHOU Li.An analysis of major effect factors in enamel EPR dosimetry[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2004,28(3):128-132.
点击复制

牙釉质EPR剂量测定方法的主要影响因素分析(/HTML)
分享到：

《国际放射医学核医学杂志》[ISSN:1673-4114/CN:12-1381/R]

卷:
28
期数:
2004年第3期
页码:
128-132
栏目:
放射医学
出版日期:
1900-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
An analysis of major effect factors in enamel EPR dosimetry
作者:
周莉
300192 天津, 中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学放射医学研究所保健物理室
Author(s):
ZHOU Li
Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical Col-lege, Tianjin 300192, China
关键词:
牙釉质; 电子顺磁共振; 辐射剂量; 辐射监测
Keywords:
enamel; electron paramagnetic resonance; radiation dose; radiation monitoring
分类号:
R144.1
摘要:
EPR(电子顺磁共振)剂量测定方法是回顾性测定个人辐射剂量的主要方法,它能够准确估算出很久以前发生的辐射照射事件的吸收剂量值,其理论基础是在牙釉质中,辐射所致自由基水平随着辐射剂量的增加而增加。目前,将EPR方法用于低剂量测定还存在一些困难,为了降低测量阈值,减小误差,优化方法,需要进一步研究该方法的影响因素。本文重点分析了影响牙釉质EPR剂量方法测量阈值和测量结果不确定度的主要因素,并对解决这些问题的修正方法进行了讨论。
Abstract:
Effective dose assessment can be given even long after the irradiation exposure event by the method of EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) dosimetry, which has been developed into a lead-ing method for retrospective dosimetry of individual radiation exposure. The principle of EPR dosimetry is based on the fact that the concentration of radiation-induced radicals increases with irradiation dose. There is still some difficulty in the measurement of low dose at present, so further investigation on the effect fac-tors of the method is required in order to lower measure threshold, decrease error and optimize the method. Several major effect factors of measurement threshold and result uncertainty in EPR dosimetry have been analyzed and the corresponding correction methods for the factors were proposed.

参考文献/References:

[1] Regulla D. From dating to biophysics-20 years of progress in applied ESR spectroscopy[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1023-1030.
[2] Aragno D, Fattibene P, Onori S. Dental radiography:tooth enamel EPR dose assessment from Rando phantom measurements[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2000, 45(9):2671-2683.
[3] Romanyukha AA, Nagy V, Sleptchonok O, et al. Individual biodosimetry at the natural radiation background level[J].Health Phys, 2001, 80(1):71-73.
[4] Ivannikov AI, Skvortsov VG, Stepanenko VF, et al. Tooth enamel EPR dosimetry:sources of errors and their correction[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1291-1296.
[5] Ivannikov AI, Tikunov DD, Skvortsov VG, et al. Elimination of the background signal in tooth enamel samples for EPRdosimetry by means of physical-chemical treatment[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2001, 55(5):701-705.
[6] Fattibene P, Aragno D, Onori S. Effectiveness of chemical etching for background electron paramagnetic resonance signal reduction in tooth enamel[J]. Health Phys, 1998, 75(5):500-505.
[7] Ignatiev EA, Romanyukha AA, Koshta AA, et al. Selective saturation method for EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel[J].Appl Radiat Isot, 1996, 47(3):333-337.
[8] Haskell EH, Kenner GH, Hayes RB.Electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry of dentine following removal of organic material[J]. Health P hys, 1995, 68(4):579-584.
[9] Bartoll J, Stosser R, Nofz M. Generation and conversion of electronic defects in calcium carbonates by UV/Vis light[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1099-1105.
[10] Brik A, Baraboy V, Atamanenko O, et al. Metabolism in tooth enamel and reliability of retrospective dosimetry[J].Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1305-1310.
[11] Scherbina OI, Brik AB. Temperature stability of carbonate groups in tooth enamel[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1071-1075.
[12] IAEA. Use of electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry with tooth enamel for retrospective dose assessment[M].Austria:IAEA, 2002. 25-26.
[13] Brik A, Haskell E, Brik V, et al. Anisotropy effects of EPR signals and mechanisms of mass transfer in tooth enamel and bones[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1077-1083.
[14] Zdravkova M, Crokart N, Trompier F, et al. Retrospective dosimetry after criticality accidents using low-frequency EPR:a study of whole human teeth irradiated in a mixed neutron and gamma-radiation field[J]. Radiat Res, 2003,160(2):168-173.
[15] Haskell EH, Hayes RB, Romanyukha AA, et al. Preliminary report on the development of a virtually nondestructive additive dose technique for EPR dosimetry[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2000, 52(5):1065-1070.
[16] Ishchenko SS, Vorona IP, Okulov SM, et al. 13C hyperfine interactions of CO2- in irradiated tooth enamel as studied by EPR[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2002, 56(6):815-819.

相似文献/References:

[1]任越,张慧芳,胡波,等.电离辐射诱导小鼠骨电子顺磁共振信号检测的影响因素[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2015,39(5):371.[doi:10. 3760 / cma. j. issn. 1673-4114. 2015. 05. 004]
　ren yue,zhang huifang,hu bo,et al.influencing factors of detection on ionizing radiation-induced electron paramagnetic resonance signal in bones[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2015,39(3):371.[doi:10. 3760 / cma. j. issn. 1673-4114. 2015. 05. 004]
[2]范亚光.牙釉质ESR回顾性剂量技术与剂量重建[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2002,26(2):90.
　FAN Ya-guang.Retrospective dosimetry technique of tooth enamel ESR and its application in dose reconstruction[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2002,26(3):90.
[3]吴伟章.牙釉质电子顺磁共振剂量重建研究的若干进展[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2002,26(4):186.
　WU Wei-zhang.Progresses in dose reconstruction by tooth enamel electron paramagnetic resonance[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2002,26(3):186.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2004-03-09。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01