参考文献/References:
[1] Cardiovascular diseases C CVDs)[DB/OL]. Geneva:World Health Organization, 2013[2012-10-29]. http://www.who.int/media-centre/factsheets/fs317/en/index.html.
[2] Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease:Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee,Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiologyand Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation, 2005,111(5):682-696.
[3] Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990, 15(4):827-832.
[4] Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, et al. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 36(4):1253-1260.
[5] Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, et al. Coronary calcification,coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events:the St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46(1):158-165.
[6] Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification:observations from a registry of 25, 253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(18):1860-1870.
[7] Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, et al. The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009,54(20):1872-1882.
[8] Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, et al. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors:mean three-year outco-mes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46(5):807-814.
[9] Keelan PC, Bielak LF, Ashai K, et al. Long-term prognostic value of coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomo-graphy in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Circulation,2001,104(4):412-417.
[10] McClelland RL, Nasir K, Budoff M, et al. Arterial age as a function of coronary artery t’alcium(from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Athero-sclerosis[MESA]). Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103(1):59-63.
[11] Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation, 1996, 93(11):1951-1953.
[12] O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensusdocument on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosisand prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation, 2000,102(1):126-140.
[13] Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology, 2003,228(3):826-833.
[14] Nucifora G, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease across the Framingham risk categories:coronary artery calcium scoring and MSCT coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol, 2009, 16(3):368-375.
[15] Gottlieb 1,Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 55(7):627-634.
[16] Kitamura A, Kobayashi T, Ueda K, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery calcification by multi-detector row computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis in Japanese patients. J Epidemiol, 2005, 15(5):187-193.
[17] Mitsutake R, Niimura H, Miura S, et al. Clinical significance of the coronary calcification score by multidetector row computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary stenosis in Japanese patients. Circ J, 2006, 70(9):1122-1127.
[18] Budoff MJ, Gul KM. Expert review on coronary calcium. Vase Health Risk Manag, 2008, 4(2):315-324.
[19] Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.Circulation, 2000, 101(12):1465-1478.
[20] Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology/Ameri-can Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation, 2003,108(11):1404-1418.
[21] Schuijf JD, Poldermans D, Shaw LJ, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2006, 33(1):93-104.
[22] Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, et al. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 29(1):69-77.
[23] Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(8):830-840.
[24] Beanlands RS, Youssef G. Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease:PET is superior to SPECT:Pro. J Nucl Cardiol,2010,17(4):683-695.
[25] Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998, 32(1):57-62.
[26] Rozanski A, Gransar H, Wong ND, et al. Clinical outcomes after both coronary calcium scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(12):1352-1361.
[27] Alvarez Tamargo JA, Martin-Ambrosio ES, Tarin ER, et al.Significance of the treadmill scores and high-risk criteria for exercise testing in non-high-risk patients with unstable angina and an intermediate Duke treadmill score. Acta Cardiol, 2008, 63(5):557-564.
[28] Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease:incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratifica-tion. Circulation, 1996, 93(5):905-914.
[29] Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, et al. Underestimation of extent of,ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol, 2007,14(4):521-528.
[30] van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli 0,et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 53(7):623-632.
[31] Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. Hybrid PET/CT is greater than the sum of its parts. J Nucl Cardiol, 2008, 15(1):118-122.
[32] Gaemperli 0, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion fromst and-alone SPECT and CT:clinical experience. J Nucl Med,2007,48(5):696-703.
[33] Berman DS, Wong ND, Gransar H, et al. Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(4):923-930.
[34] He ZX, Hedrick TD, Pratt CM, et al. Severity of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation, 2000, 101(3):244-251.
[35] Schenker MP, Dorbala S, Hong EC, et al. Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease:a combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study.Circulation, 2008, 117(13):1693-1700.
[36] Uebleis C, Becker A, Griesshammer I,et al. Stable coronary artery disease:prognostic value of myocardial perfusion SPECT in relation to coronary calcium scoring-long-term follow-up. Radio-logy, 2009, 252(3):682-690.
[37] Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49(3):378-402.
[38] Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, et al.The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction og cardiac risk.J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,54(20):1872-1882.
[39] Schepis T, Gaemperli 0,Koepfli P, et al. Added value of coronary artery calcium score as an adjunct to gated SPECT for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in an intermediate-risk population. J Nucl Med, 2007, 48(9):1424-1430.
[40] Berman DS, Wong ND, Gransar H, et al. Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(4):923-930.
[41] Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A, et al. Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease:results of 1,764 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37(2):451-457.
[42] Rosman J, Shapiro M, Pandey A, et al. Lack of correlation between coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol, 2006, 13(3):333-337.
[43] Wu MT, Yang P, Huang YL, et al. Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening:concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(4):923-928.
[44] Jacobs PC, Isgum I, Gondrie MJ, et al. Coronary artery calcification scoring in low-dose ungated CT screening for lung cancer:interscan agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(5):1244-1249.
[45] Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 56(23):1914-1921.
[46] Mylonas I,Kazmi M, Fuller L, et al. Measuring coronary artery calcification using positron emission tomography-computed tomography attenuation correction images. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 13(9):786-792.