[1]魏之星,王嵩,苏晓丽,等.ECToolbox软件4种公式计算左心室射血分数的比较分析[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2013,37(3):160-164.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.03.008]
　WEI Zhi-xing,WANG Song,SU Xiao-li,et al.Comparison of the four formulas of software ECToolbox for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with the equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2013,37(3):160-164.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.03.008]
点击复制

ECToolbox软件4种公式计算左心室射血分数的比较分析(/HTML)
分享到：

《国际放射医学核医学杂志》[ISSN:1673-4114/CN:12-1381/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2013年第3期
页码:
160-164
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2013-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the four formulas of software ECToolbox for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with the equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography
作者:
魏之星;  王嵩;  苏晓丽;  王燕;  王磊;  秦伟;  苏丽杏
200032 上海, 上海中医药大学附属龙华医院放射科
Author(s):
WEI Zhi-xing;  WANG Song;  SU Xiao-li;  WANG Yan;  WANG Lei;  QIN Wei;  SU Li-xing
Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Longhua Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
关键词:
每搏输出量; 门控血池显像; ECToolbox软件
Keywords:
Stroke volume; Gated blood-pool imaging; ECToolbox software
DOI:
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.03.008
摘要:
目的 比较爱莫瑞心脏工具箱(ECToolbox)4种公式(R0、R1、R2、R3)计算心电图门控核素心肌灌注SPECT(G-MPS)左心室射血分数(LVEF)与平衡法核素心室造影(ERNV)所得结果的相关性和一致性,并判断4种公式所得结果的诊断阈值。方法 选取63例患者,其中,23例有心肌梗死病史,40例为可疑冠心病患者。同一患者在一周内完成99Tcm-MIBI静息态G-MPS和99Tcm-红细胞ERNV,用ECToolbox软件中的R0、R1、R2、R3公式分别计算LVEF,将计算结果与ERNV结果进行对比分析,并以后者所得的LVEF≥50%作为标准,通过受试者操作特征曲线判断R0~R3 4个公式的最佳诊断阈值。结果 ERNV得到的LVEF的平均值为55.41%±17.49%,R0~R3 4种公式得到的LVEF分别为63.75%±16.63%、55.87%±15.99%、69.22%±18.83%、56.32%±14.47%。4种公式所得结果与ERNV所得结果具有较强的相关性(r均>0.95,P均<0.01);4种公式计算的LVEF平均值均高于ERNV的LVEF平均值,其中,R0和R2公式所得结果与ERNV结果的差异具有统计学意义(t=15.775和21.525,P均<0.01);R1和R3公式所得结果与ERNV结果的差异无统计学意义(t=0.848和1.448,P>0.05)。以ERNV的LVEF≥50%作为正常诊断值,R0~R3公式所得LVEF的最佳诊断阈值分别为56.5%、51.5%、64.5%和52.5%。结论 用于G-MPS的ECToolbox的4种公式与ERNV计算的LVEF具有较强的相关性,但LVEF平均值有差异,同一患者在随诊过程中应采用同一个公式进行计算,用于诊断心功能时,每个公式应选用不同的阈值。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the correlation and consistency of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by electrocardiography gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (G-MPS) using the four formulas (R0-R3) in Emory cardiac toolbox (ECToolbox) software and by equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV),and determine the optimal diagnostic thresholds of the four formulas.Methods Sixty-three patients,including 23 patients with a history of myocardial infarction and 40 patients with suspected coronary heart disease,underwent both 99Tcm-MIBI rest G-MPS and 99Tcm labeled red blood cell ERNV within a week.The LVEF values calculated by R0,R1,R2 and R3 formulas of ECToolbox were compared with those obtained by ERNV.Using LVEF≥50% obtained by ERNV as the gold standard,the optimal diagnostic thresholds of the four formulas (R0-R3) were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results The mean LVEF of ERNV was 55.41%±17.49%.The mean LVEF values of the four formulas were 63.75%±16.63%,55.87%±15.99%,69.22%±18.83% and 56.32%±14.47%,respectively.On correlation analysis,a strong positive correlation was observed between LVEF values derived by ERNV and those derived by the four formulas (all r>0.95,all P<0.01).The differences of LVEF were statistically significant between ERNV and the two formulas R0 and R2 (t=15.775 and 21.525,both P<0.01),while between ERNV and the two formulas R1 and R3 (t=0.848 and 1.448,both P>0.05).Normal cutoff values for LVEF on R0,R1,R2,R3 were 56.5%,51.5%,64.5% and 52.5% respectively,using a 50% or more cutoff value on ERNV.Conclusions A strong correlation was observed among the four formulas of ECToolbox software programs when compared with ERNV.However,there are subtle differences in the objective values of LVEF generated by individual calculation methods,which must be taken into account for clinical studies.

参考文献/References:

[1] 汪太松,赵晋华,邢岩. ECToolbox软件计算左心室射血分数的适用性. 中国医学影像技术. 2010. 26(2):330-332.
[2] Carcia EV,Santana CA,Faber TL,et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance for detection fo coronary artery disease (CAD) of the ir program (QPS) with that of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox(ECTb) for automated quantification of myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Cardiol,2008,15(3):476-478.
[3] Kakhki VR,Zakavi SR,Sadeqhi R. Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion gingle photon emission tomography,for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction,in patients with and without perfusion defects. Hell J Nucl Med,2007,10(1):19-23.
[4] Faber TL,Cooke CD,Folks RD,et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images:an integrated method. J Nucl Med,1999,40(4):650-659.
[5] Wang F,Zhang J,Fang W,et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by gated SPECT and cardiac MRI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2009,36(10):1611-1621.
[6] Gutberlet M,Mehl S,Fröhlich M,et al. Determination of ventricular volumes in coronary artery disease:comparison of two gated SPECT analysis tools with MRI. Nuklearmedizin,2006,45(2):63-73.
[7] Tsuboi K,Fuse H,Sasaki M. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT versus cardiac MRI. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi,2011,67(10):1304-1313.
[8] Ballal S,Patel CD,Singla S,et al. Comparison of software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT:correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in the Indian population. Nucl Med Commun,2012,33(11):1160-1168.
[9] Kiratli PO,Bozkurt MF. Assessment of cardiac parameters using gated myocardial perfusion and echocardiography in children. Cardiol Young,2009,19(1):53-59.
[10] Harisankar CN,Mittal BR,Kamaleshwaran KK,et al. Reliability of left ventricular ejection fraction calculated with gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with extensive perfusion defect. Nucl Med Commun,2011,32(6):503-507.

相似文献/References:

[1]李殿富,袁冬兰,曹克将,等.门控心肌灌注SPECT相位分析技术评价心力衰竭患者左室不同步的价值[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2010,34(1):38.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2010.01.010]
　LI Dian-fu,YUA N Dong-lan,CAO Ke-jiang,et al.The value of phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT to assess left ventricular dyssynchrony[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2010,34(3):38.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2010.01.010]
[2]袁建伟,冯彦林,贺小红,等.20lTl定量门控心肌灌注体层显像与99mTc-红细胞门控心血池显像测定左心室射血分数的对比研究[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2008,32(2):86.
　YUAN Jian-wei,FENG Yan-lin,HE Xiao-hong,et al.Comparison study of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by 20lTl gated myocardial imaging and 99mTc-red blood cell gated blood-pool imaging[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2008,32(3):86.
[3]薛荣梅,宋丽萍.门控心肌灌注SPECT在冠心病方面的应用进展[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2006,30(6):353.
　XUE Rong-mei,SONG Li-ping.Usefulness of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in coronary heart disease[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2006,30(3):353.
[4]孙晓光,陈绍亮.平衡法门控心室造影操作指南[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,1998,22(5):209.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-01-05。
通讯作者:王嵩,Email:wangson0829@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01