[1]崔博,刘保平,谢新立,等.门控心肌灌注显像负荷总积分及相位分析对冠状动脉病变程度的评估价值[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2018,(2):115-120.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.02.004]
 Cui Bo,Liu Baoping,Xie Xinli,et al.Assessment of the value of summed stress score and phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging in the severity of coronary artery lesion[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2018,(2):115-120.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.02.004]
点击复制

门控心肌灌注显像负荷总积分及相位分析对冠状动脉病变程度的评估价值(/HTML)
分享到:

《国际放射医学核医学杂志》[ISSN:1673-4114/CN:12-1381/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年第2期
页码:
115-120
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-05-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment of the value of summed stress score and phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging in the severity of coronary artery lesion
作者:
崔博 刘保平 谢新立 王瑞华
450000, 郑州大学第一附属医院核医学科
Author(s):
Cui Bo Liu Baoping Xie Xinli Wang Ruihua
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
关键词:
门控心肌灌注显像冠状动脉病变相位分析负荷总积分Gensini积分
Keywords:
Gated myocardial perfusion imagingCoronary heart diseaseChase analysisSummed stress scoreGensini score
DOI:
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.02.004
摘要:
目的 探讨门控心肌灌注显像(GMPI)负荷总积分(SSS)及相位分析对冠状动脉(简称冠脉)病变程度的评估价值。方法 入组先后行冠脉造影和99Tcm-甲氧基异丁基异腈两日法负荷-静息GMPI的胸痛患者89例,其中,经冠脉造影确诊冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(简称冠心病)者52例(冠心病组),冠脉硬化者26例(冠脉硬化组),正常者11例(正常组)。冠脉病变程度由Gensini积分表示。采用17节段目测半定量法及定量门控心肌断层显像软件相位分析得出SSS和相位直方图带宽(BW)、相位标准差(SD)和熵,分析上述参数与Gensini积分的相关性,以及在冠心病组、冠脉硬化组及正常组之间的差异。统计学方法采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、单因素方差分析、相关分析、岭回归分析和配对t检验。结果 (1)单因素分析结果显示,在病变程度不同的各组中,Gensini积分随GMPI各参数的增高而逐渐增高。(2)岭回归分析结果显示,BW是反映冠脉病变严重程度最显著的参数,其他依次为SSS、熵和SD (t=6.692、3.688、3.559和2.896,均P<0.05)。(3)冠心病组的SSS和静息BW、SD、熵与Gensini积分呈正相关(r=0.750、0.747、0.671和0.695,均P<0.05)。而冠脉硬化组及正常组的各参数与Gensini积分无明显相关性。冠心病组的静息BW (52.4°±20.6°)、SD (16.7°±7.7°)、熵(41.3%±8.0%)均显著大于冠脉硬化组(23.7°±7.4°、6.4°±2.9°、28.7%±8.0%),差异有统计学意义(F=8.299、8.176、6.752,均P<0.001),但冠脉硬化组与正常组间上述参数的差异均无统计学意义(F=1.462、0.812和1.422,均P>0.05)。89例患者的静息与负荷BW、SD、熵之间的差异均无统计学意义(t=0.283、1.121和0.726,均P>0.05)。结论 SSS、BW、SD、熵在评估冠脉病变程度中具有一定的价值。静息、负荷GMPI相位分析对评价左室收缩同步性的价值相当。
Abstract:
Objective To assesse the value of summed stress score (SSS) and phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) in the severity of coronary artery lesion. Methods Eighty-nine patients with chest pain who underwent coronary angiography and 99Tcm-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (99Tcm-MIBI) two-day stress-rest GMPI were enrolled in this study. Among them, 52 patients were diagnosed with coronary heart disease by coronary angiography; 26 patients had coronary atherosclerosis and 11 patients were normal. The degree of coronary artery lesion was represented by Gensini score. SSS and phase histogram bandwidth (BW), standard deviation (SD), and entropy were derived using a 17-segment visual semi-quantitative method and the quantitative gated SPECT software phase analysis to analyze the correlation of the parameters with the Gensini score. The differences of the above parameters among coronary heart disease group, coronary artery sclerosis group, and normal group were compared. Kruskal-Wallis test, ANOVA, correlation analysis, ridge regression, and paired t test were used for statistical methods. Results (1)Univariate analysis showed that Gensini score gradually increased with the increase of GMPI parameters. (2)Ridge regression analysis showed that BW was the most significant parameter that reflected the severity of coronary artery lesion, followed by SSS, entropy, and SD(t=6.692, 3.688, 3.559 and 2.896,all P<0.05). (3)SSS, BW, SD, entropy of coronary heart disease group, and Gensini score were positively correlated (r=0.750, 0.747, 0.671 and 0.695, all P<0.05). No significant correlation was found between the parameters and Gensini score in the coronary artery sclerosis and normal groups. Rest GMPI analysis showed that BW(52.4°±20.6°), SD(16.7°±7.7°), and entropy(41.3%±8.0%) in coronary heart disease group were significantly higher than those in the coronary artery sclerosis group (23.7°±7.4°, 6.4°±2.9°, and 28.7%±8.0%, respectively; F=8.299, 8.176 and 6.752, all P<0.001). No significant difference was found in these parameters between coronary artery sclerosis group and normal group (F=1.462, 0.812 and 1.422, all P>0.05). The differences in BW, SD and entropy between rest and stress GMPI in 89 patients were not significantly different (t=0.283, 1.121 and 0.726, all P>0.05). Conclusions SSS, BW, SD, and entropy have certain value in assessing the degree of coronary artery disease. Rest and stress GMPI have similar values in assessing left ventricular synchrony.

参考文献/References:

[1] Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging)[J]. Circulation, 2003, 108(11):1404-1418. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000080946.42225.4D.
[2] 郭悦, 姚稚明, 张娟, 等. 负荷-静息99Tcm-MIBI门控心肌灌注断层显像相位分析评价左室缺血心肌收缩同步性[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2015, 35(3):195-199. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2015.03.009. Guo Y, Yao ZM, Zhang J, et al. Systolic synchrony of ischemic myocardium assessed by stress-rest 99Tcm-MIBI gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 35(3):195-199.
[3] 王建锋, 王跃涛. 门控心肌灌注显像相位分析在心血管疾病左室机械不同步中的应用[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2013, 37(4):247-252. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.04.014. Wang JF, Wang YT. The application of phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging to assess left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiovascular disease[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2013, 37(4):247-252.
[4] 高阅春, 何继强, 姜腾勇, 等. 冠心病患者冠状动脉病变严重程度与冠心病危险因素的相关分析[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2012, 27(3):178-181. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2012.03.006. Gao YC, He JQ, Jiang TY, et al. Relationship of coronary stenosis with its risk factors in patients of coronary disease[J]. Chin Circ J, 2012, 27(3):178-181.
[5] Vlietstra RE, Kronmal RA, Seth AK, et al. Correlation of the coronary heart disease risk factors and coronary angiographic data[J]. Kardiologiia, 1982, 22(2):67-72.
[6] Travin MI, Heller GV, Johnson LL, et al. The prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT imaging in patients undergoing stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2004, 11(3):253-262. DOI:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.02.005.
[7] Ahlberg AW, Kazi FA, Azemi T, et al. Usefulness of stress gated technetium-99m single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for the prediction of cardiac death in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and suspected coronary artery disease[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2012, 109(1):26-30. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.066.
[8] 沈艳, 马玉玲. 总负荷积分与冠脉Gensini积分的相关性分析[J]. 江苏医药, 2010, 36(15):1761-1763. DOI:10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2010.15.008. Shen Y, Ma YL. Analysis of correlation between summed stress score and Gensini score[J]. Jiangsu Med J, 2010, 36(15):1761-1763.
[9] 付瑛, 王蒨, 米宏志, 等. SPECT/CT融合影像探究冠心病心肌灌注异常与冠状动脉狭窄的相关关系[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2015, 35(4):241-245. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn. 2095-2848. 2015.04.001. Fu Y, Wang J, Mi HZ, et al. Evaluation of correlation between myocardial perfusion abnormality and coronary artery stenosis with SPECT/CT[J]. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 35(4):241-245.
[10] Lin F, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, et al. Multidetector computed tomography coronary artery plaque predictors of stress-induced myocardial ischemia by SPECT[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2008, 197(2):700-709. DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.002.
[11] Yoda S, Nakanishi K, Tano A, et al. Major cardiac event risk scores estimated with gated myocardial perfusion imaging in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease[J]. J Cardiol, 2016, 67(1):64-70. DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.008.
[12] Holman BL, Wynne J, Idoine J, et al. Disruption in the temporal sequence of regional ventricular contraction. I. Characteristics and incidence in coronary artery disease[J]. Circulation, 1980, 61(6):1075-1083. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.61.6.1075.
[13] 王建锋, 王跃涛, 张晓丽, 等. 门控心肌灌注显像相位分析评价陈旧性心肌梗死患者左心室收缩同步性[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2015, 43(7):599-604. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758. 2015. 07.007. Wang JF, Wang YT, Zhang XL, et al. Left ventricular systolic synchrony assessed by phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with old myocardial infarction[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2015, 43(7):599-604.
[14] Sharma RK, Volpe G, Rosen BD, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular dyssynchrony for major adverse cardiovascular events in asymptomatic women and men:the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis[J/OL]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014, 3(4):e000975[2017-10-19]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310386. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.114.000975.
[15] Ovadia M, Abudayyeh I. Risk stratification by quantitation of LV dyssynchrony:a new branch of the field of nuclear cardiology[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2014, 21(4):747-752. DOI:10.1007/s12350-014-9907-3.
[16] Yamada S, Arrell DK, Kane GC, et al. Mechanical dyssynchrony precedes QRS widening in ATP-sensitive K+ channel-deficient dilated cardiomyopathy[J/OL]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2013, 2(6):e000410[2017-10-19]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3886734. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.113.000410.
[17] Tavares A, Peclat T, Lima RS. Prevalence and predictors of left intraventricular dyssynchrony determined by phase analysis in patients undergoing gatedSPECT myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 32(5):845-852. DOI:10.1007/s10554-015-0833-5.
[18] Lee PW, Zhang Q, Yip GW, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony in coronary artery disease with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Clin Sci(Lond), 2009, 116(6):521-529. DOI:10.1042/CS20080100.
[19] Zhou Y, Li D, Feng J, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony parameters measured byphase analysis of post-stress and resting gated spect myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. World J Nucl Med, 2013, 12(1):3-7. DOI:10.4103/1450-1147.113931.
[20] Chen CC, Shen TY, Chang MC, et al. Stress-induced myocardial ischemia is associated with early post-stress left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as assessed by phase analysis of 201Tl gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2012, 39(12):1904-1909. DOI:10.1007/s00259-012-2208-7.

相似文献/References:

[1]樊孝廉,舒毅,曾春平,等.99Tcm-MIBI门控心肌灌注显像在2型糖尿病无症状心肌缺血患者中的价值[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2016,40(3):171.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2016.03.002]
 Fan Xiaolian,Shu Yi,Zeng Chunping,et al.Significance of 99Tcm-MIBI gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes but without myocardial ischemia symptoms[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2016,40(2):171.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2016.03.002]
[2]王建锋,王跃涛.门控心肌灌注显像相位分析在心血管疾病左室机械不同步中的应用[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2013,37(4):247.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.04.014]
 WANG Jian-feng,WANG Yue-tao.The application of phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging to assess left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiovascular disease[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2013,37(2):247.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2013.04.014]
[3]程艳,李思进,李险峰,等.99Tcm-NOET门控心肌灌注SPECT评价冠心病的价值[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2009,33(5):257.[doi:10.3760/cnla.j.issn.1673-4114.2009.05.001]
 CHENG Yah,LI Si-jin,LI Xian-feng,et al.Value of 99Tcm-NOET gated myocardial perfusion on patients with coronary heart disease[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2009,33(2):257.[doi:10.3760/cnla.j.issn.1673-4114.2009.05.001]
[4]邓惠兴,马爱群.门控心肌灌注显像时相分析在心脏再同步化治疗中的应用[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2009,33(5):293.[doi:10.3760/cnla.j.issn.1673-4114.2009.05.012]
 DENG Hui-xin,MA A i-qun.The application of phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2009,33(2):293.[doi:10.3760/cnla.j.issn.1673-4114.2009.05.012]
[5]袁建伟,冯彦林,贺小红,等.20lTl定量门控心肌灌注体层显像与99mTc-红细胞门控心血池显像测定左心室射血分数的对比研究[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2008,32(2):86.
 YUAN Jian-wei,FENG Yan-lin,HE Xiao-hong,et al.Comparison study of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by 20lTl gated myocardial imaging and 99mTc-red blood cell gated blood-pool imaging[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2008,32(2):86.
[6]王蓉,孙凯.冠状动脉CT诊断斑块性病变的无创影像学进展[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志,2017,41(6):448.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2017.06.012]
 Wang Rong,Sun Kai.Uninvasive imaging of coronary artery CT diagnosis of plaque lesions[J].International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine,2017,41(2):448.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2017.06.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-10-19。
通讯作者:刘保平,Email:Liubp5000@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-09